2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) lent KRW 10 million to the Defendant on August 29, 200, the interest rate of KRW 200 on November 30, 200, and the due date of repayment of KRW 10 million on November 30, 200. On April 20, 2006, the due date of repayment was set as March 30, 2009 and lent KRW 23 million to the Defendant.

(hereinafter “each of the instant loans”). Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay each of the instant loans and damages for delay to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointor C, who is the deceased’s heir D.

B. The defendant's assertion is not the defendant's argument, but the defendant's living together with E borrowed money from the network D, so the plaintiff (appointed party) cannot respond to the plaintiff's request.

2. While the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) asserts that the Defendant, other than E, is the borrower, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit, as there is no evidence to prove the authenticity of the Plaintiff’s certificate Nos. 1 and 2 (money tea certificate). The Plaintiff’s claim is without merit, since there is no other evidence to acknowledge the authenticity.

3. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is dismissed.