Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

No person shall, in using and managing the means of access used in electronic financial transactions, deliver the means of access knowing that it is intended to use it for a crime or is to be used for a crime unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a proposal from his name-free person that he would create a false transaction performance and store credit rating, and then would prejudice so-called work loans. On January 29, 2019, the Defendant sent the physical card, which is a means of access connected to B bank account (Account Number C) in the name-free person, to Kwikset service.

Accordingly, the Defendant knowingly delivered the means of access used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written petition of D;

1. Application of deposit details, provision and reply of financial transaction information, and investigation reports (Submission of Suspect Data)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 3 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;