Although the Defendant used the FTS125 Oral Ba, which was owned by the Defendant, for the purpose of the carriage of oil, the Defendant purchased the FTS 125 Oral Ba with the Victim LIG Damage Insurance (State) and the “non-commercial carriage,” and used it as the “non-commercial carriage if a traffic accident occurs due to the Oral Baal Ba,” and was committed with intent to receive insurance money from the victim as if the traffic accident occurred.

On September 16, 2010, around 17:31, 2010, the Defendant was involved in a traffic accident while G was delivering food using the FTS125 Obane owned by the Defendant in front of the Nam-gu Busan National University, Busan National University, the Defendant, around 17:34 on the same day, received compensation from the victim as if the traffic accident occurred, by falsely receiving compensation amounting to 111,60 won as the repair cost of the vehicle from around the time to December 29, 201, and by deceiving the victim nine times in total in the same manner as indicated in the attached list of crimes from around the time to December 29, 201, received insurance money totaling KRW 128,077,240 as the insurance money from the victim.

2. Determination:

A. The witness H’s legal statement, the statement of the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant, and the statement of the prosecutor’s protocol against the defendant are written as evidence consistent with or consistent with the facts charged in the instant case.

B. The following facts are acknowledged according to the records of this case, such as witness I’s legal statement.

0 For two-wheeled automobiles, the usage thereof is “for delivery for oil transport and for rent” (a two-wheeled automobile used for charge or for rent, a leased two-wheeled automobile, a two-wheeled automobile similar thereto, Kwikset Service, a leased two-wheeled automobile, etc.), and a two-wheeled automobile used for delivery for oil transport.”