However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Defendants and C (Co-defendants before separate declaration) shall be the victim F (26 years old) at E convenience stores located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu Dong-gu, on February 26, 2017, at the victim F (26 years old) 1: 01:10 the bit bit of bit of bitchch, bit of a bitchch

The reason was that “I expressed their desire to do so.”

At around 01:15 on the same day, Defendants and C went out of the convenience store of Defendant A, and Defendant B took about 20 times from the face of the victim from the road outside of the convenience store of drinking and drinking. Defendant A took about 14 times due to drinking and drinking, and Defendant C continued to take about 20 times from the victim’s head, blur, and her mar due to drinking and launching.

As a result, the Defendants, in collaboration with C, suffered bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants and C’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to standing photographs, CCTV photographs, and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the relevant Act and Article 2 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective of imprisonment);

1. Defendants on probation: The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of punishment] [the person subject to special mitigation] in the mitigation area (two months to one year] [the person subject to special mitigation] in this case] [the decision of sentence] in this case is a case where the Defendants assaulted the victim who could not resist any particular resistance against drinking and sal face, body body, etc. and inflicted an injury in light of the applicable criminal law.

However, there is no history of punishment of fine or heavier, and there is a reflective error by recognizing the crime of this case, and a smooth agreement with the victim, and all other favorable circumstances such as the defendants' age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, etc.