However, with respect to Defendant B, the same shall apply for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On May 207, the Defendants came to know that the victims D, who had no expertise in the landscape, had provided advice or lent money to mine the landscape of the stone worth trading at the time of the purchase of the stone in Indonesia, and that the victims subsequently got aware of the fact that the victims were keeping the stone imported from Indonesia without any particular guard or equipment in the Gong E in the Gyeonggi-do population at the time of the Gyeonggi-do.

Defendants stated in the four written indictments for the Dodonessan, the victim owned by the victim, which was placed at the above hole around 13:00 on September 6, 2015, that was combined with each other, the four boxes of indictments for the donessan of Indonessan, the market price of which is the sum of KRW 180,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

Band Band B were loaded into the cargo vehicle and stolen the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. The witness D and F’s respective legal statements, witness G and H’s respective legal statements;

1. Protocols concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution (including the parts concerning the statements of each D);

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement by each prosecutor's office with respect to G, D, and I (G shall exclude the portion, the actual authenticity of which is not recognized in the case of Gu);

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Preparation and reporting of recording notes to I and J;

1. Investigation Report - Investigation of text messages sent by B to a cell phone of the victim;

1. Proxy letter, land lease agreement, expenditure statement, Indonesia map, expenditure statement, account transaction details, card use details [the Defendants are owned by Defendant A, and thus, theft is not established.]

The argument is asserted.

The Defendants are separate from the Defendant’s business of collecting stone in which the victims and K engaged in the business.