At around 00:10 on May 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the personal information, etc. of the Defendant, who was seated on the back of the taxi under the influence of alcohol, on the ground that, at the front of the B apartment near Won-si, a female under the influence of alcohol was unable to perform his/her duties because he/she was unable to get off the taxi; and (b) the circumstances leading up to the D Zone of the original police station, which was called, verified the Defendant’s personal information, etc. on the back of the taxi; and (c) committed assault, without any reason, of walking the chest part of the above E once

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning violence compact photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine (including the fact that the degree of violence against a police officer is not serious, the defendant commits a crime against the wrong, and the fact that there is no record of being punished as an act of violence except that sentenced to a fine for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 2002);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;