2. The crime of transferring an access medium, such as the instant crime, is highly likely to be abused for another serious crime by impairing the stability and reliability of electronic financial transactions, and the account actually transferred by the Defendant was used in the so-called “scaming,” and the damage was incurred. However, even though the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and the Defendant reflects his mistake, and considering all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it is obvious that the prosecutor's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.