구상금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A and B jointly and severally share 31,594,380 won and 31,071,000 won among them. < Amended by Act No. 7393, Jan. 1, 2005>
1. As to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant A and B
A. The plaintiff's assertion of the claim is re-litigation for the extension of the prescription period of the final and conclusive judgment against the above defendants (Seoul District Court Decision 2005Da46826 delivered on November 11, 2005).
Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. As to the plaintiff's remaining Defendants' claims
A. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the deceased H and the network G for the claim of reimbursement on November 11, 2005. On November 11, 2005, the above court rendered a judgment that "the deceased H and the network G shall jointly and severally with the defendant A and the plaintiff 31,594,380 won and 31,071,000 won among them shall be paid 17% per annum from January 7, 2005 to October 21, 2005, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment." The above judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2005 (the above 2005Da46826, Nov. 14, 2014) that "the deceased's spouse died as the deceased's heir."
(Defendant I and J renounced the deceased’s children’s inheritance). Defendant C filed a report on the inheritance-limited acceptance with the Cheongju District Court Decision 2014Mo1006 on December 24, 2014.
On June 9, 2015, the above court rendered an adjudication on acceptance of a qualified acceptance report.
3) The deceased on November 24, 2009, the deceased on November 24, 2009, and his heir is Defendant D, E, and F. Defendant D, E, and F filed a report of inheritance recognition under the Busan District Court Family Branch Order 2009Mo3647, Dec. 10, 2009. The above court rendered a judgment of acceptance of a qualified acceptance report on December 24, 2009. [No. 1, 2, Eul’s evidence No. 1, 2, 2, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]
B. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant C as the heir of the network G, and Defendant D, E, and F, as the heir of the network H, have each qualified acceptance. As such, Defendant C, Defendant D, E, and F, within the scope of their respective inherited property inherited from the network H, shall repay the above claim for reimbursement within the scope of their respective inherited property.