If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On January 5, 2017, the Defendant, at around 01:10, received a report from the “C” station located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, without paying the drinking value, and received a report from the “C” station, and sent the phrase to the site to pay the drinking value from the slope E belonging to the department of the police station of the Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, which called “not paying the drinking value”, and gave a bath to it. The Defendant, as his hand, purchased the parts of the above E at one time and sent back to it at the above site, was assaulted to the above E’s price at one time by continuously.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reporting duties under the above E, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Application of statutes on site and victim photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. The sentencing guidelines do not apply since the reasons for sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are to attract the workhouse, are to select the reasons for sentencing.

Taking into account the fact that the police officer who conducts official duties assaults the police officer, which is not good to the nature of the crime, that there was a record of punishment for the crime of violence, that the defendant is against the confession of the crime of this case, and that the degree of the assault is not serious.