However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 01:15, on the roads, BJ Haak Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon Lon, which was sent to the police station upon receipt of a report 112, C, a police officer affiliated with B police station B police station, who was sent to the police station upon receipt of a report, dumping the Defendant who was under the influence of alcohol so that he could have the Defendant under the influence of alcohol returned home, dump the Defendant, and dump the chest of the police officer C at his hand, dump the said police officer’s arms at one hand, and dump the Defendant’s bomb, and dump the Defendant’s bomb.

In order to continuously restrain the Defendant, the Defendant took a bath to the police officer D who belongs to the police box B of the Pyeong Police Station B, and assaulted the chest of the above police officer D on two occasions by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each protocol of statement to C and D

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Six months from the scope of the recommended sentence to one year and six months;

2. It is so decided as per Disposition, taking into account all the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's time of and reflecting the defendant's criminal act, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, support relationship, social ties, etc. before and after the crime, etc.