The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in the misapprehension of logical and empirical rules or the free evaluation of evidence against the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a fine is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.