However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On January 10, 2015, at around 14:10, the Defendants discovered that there is a room for the protection of the victim D’s watersides in the front line of the Daegu Student Culture Center, which is located in Yongsan-gu, Daegu City, Seogu, Daegu, and Seogdong on January 10, 2015, and sought to stop committing a crime by using the key of the victim’s clothes, and by using the key of the victim’s clothes, and theft of the items contained therein.

According to the above program, Defendant B laid down the key of 252 clothes, which was located in the ward room of the other victim, and laid down the key to Defendant A, and then saw Defendant B’s net in the vicinity of the clothes room. Defendant A discovered that Defendant B, using the key he was snicked from Defendant B, was able to find out that Defendant B, who was snicked with the network while opening the 252 clothes room where the victim was kept in possession of the personal belongings, and did not commit an attempted crime.

As a result, the Defendants jointly attempted to steal the victim's property and attempted to commit it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 342 and 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants who attempted to reduce and reduce: Articles 25(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of each Criminal Act (Consideration of attempted crimes, the fact that there is no criminal record, and the fact that there is still an age in green area);

1. Defendants on probation and community service order: The portion of innocence under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. On January 10, 2015, Defendant A found that the victim E had the key above the shower box and shower the key on the shower box, and attempted to steal the goods in the victim’s clothes, and then Defendant A had the key above the 252 line of clothes in his possession.