On April 8, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million due to the charge of forging private documents and uttering of an investigation document, and the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court on February 11, 2010, and the above judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On April 30, 2009, the Defendant: (a) was rendered a judgment against the Defendant in a lawsuit seeking the return of a business license right between the Defendant and C; (b) in order to bring about a favorable judgment in the appellate court, the Defendant forged a written contract under the name of C, the husband of C, and submitted it to the appellate court.

On May 2009, the Defendant: “D shall pay the Defendant a total of KRW 50,00,000 for Eran tavern equipment, and the down payment shall be KRW 10,000,00,000,000,000, and if the balance is not paid, I voluntarily prepared the written contract, and voluntarily stated the name of “D” and copied the contract, and then submitted a copy of the forged contract to the Daegu High Court, which is the appellate court of the lawsuit, at that time.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant has forged the D's name contract without authority and exercised it.

2. On December 16, 201, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a criminal trial, such as fabrication of private documents against the Defendant opened at the Posting branch of the Daegu District Court on March 4, 2009, and the Defendant, despite having prepared a report on succession to the status of a business operator who succeeds the name of E dan from C to A with the consent of C, the Defendant made the said report and changes in the name of the business license.