beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.25 2015가합520452

회사에 관한 소송

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 27, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant and served as the captain of the Defendant Company B from December 4, 2014.

B. On January 9, 2015, the Defendant instructed the Plaintiff to draw up and report the TRCP prior to the work (Task Rok Rosk Rosk Plin and the business risk control plan).

However, on February 4, 2015, the Plaintiff sent e-mail to the Defendant that he/she would not report the TRCP, and did not actually report from February 5, 2015 to February 22, 2015.

C. On March 5, 2015, the Defendant issued a landing order to the Plaintiff by electronic mail with the following content (hereinafter “instant landing order”).

B(15) The Plaintiff’s plan for shift of maritime staff attached to the foregoing e-mail stated that the Plaintiff’s ground for leaving the said plan is “abrupted leave.”

On the same day, the defendant ordered the plaintiff to leave the telephone.

2. Tophere, such as attaching a table, gold ports (Voy. 015) B maritime staff shift program.

1) In accordance with the gold-class personnel management plan for high-class officers, it is referred to as the “A captain’s request for a duty of leaving a mission at the volume of gold port Japan. - It is later scheduled to consult about a certain schedule-related actively through a subsequent interview. 2) It is true that prior consultation on the request for a delay in selection and a request for leaving a mission during the process of the gold-class shift work has not been carried out smoothly.

- It is scheduled to do its best to provide smooth maritime human resources support through subsequent active communication, and it is not a request for a large number of co-operations of vessels;

1) On March 13, 2015, the Defendant left Japan and returned to the Republic of Korea on the same day. Around that time, the Defendant demanded an interview with the Plaintiff. (2) On March 17, 2015, the Plaintiff claimed compensation for the damages of KRW 930,048,120 on the ground that he/she was illegally forced to leave the Republic of Korea.