On January 31, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch on January 31, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Southern Prison on February 6, 2018.

1. On February 27, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around 14:20 on 14:20 on 27, 2019, at the king 21, Gwangju District Court’s Mancheon Branch’s Integrated Civil Service Center, “When she has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, she shall be paid compensation,” and the employees C of the above court’s employees “A she talks with C who is able to talk about other civil petitioners, and is going to the entrance of the office building,” “A she was able to talk about the Defendant’s her so that she was frighted, she was frighted, she was frighten, and she was frighted, and obstructed the legitimate performance of duties concerning the security of the office building of the court official.

2. At around 15:30 on February 27, 2019, the Defendant damaged public goods by means of 40,000 won for repair of the above glass windows, which are the goods installed at the court bulletin board installed at the public office, upon the request of the police called out after receiving a disturbance report as set forth in the above paragraph 1, at the entrance of the office building to support the Gwangju District Court, Gwangju District Court’s 21, the police in receipt of a disturbance report, and the police called out after receiving a demand for returning home.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each investigation report (verification, etc. of attachment of photographs of goods damaged on the bulletin board, or of estimated damage of glass windows);

1. The recycling and viewing of CCTV or mobile phone pictures;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history records and other inquiries, the status of acceptance by each individual, and the defense counsel's assertion on the investigation report (verification of the same kind of power) are asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental or physical disability at the time of each crime, but the circumstances and contents of the crime of this case, which can be known by the aforementioned evidence, and the statement of the defendant in this court.