On December 22, 2006, the Defendant sentenced 8 months to imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and completed the enforcement of the above sentence on August 17, 2007.

C’s representative director, and the Defendant, who are employed by C in charge of accounting, etc. in D, received a proposal from C to the effect that “E” as the head of the legal affairs team of the company called “E” in Japan, in which C was an investor in the apartment sale business in lots, and that C was engaged in the business of selling apartment unsold in lots at a price lower than the market price after having invested the amount of KRW 40 billion from E company located in a day-to day-day, and the victim F was engaged in the business of selling apartment unsold in lots at a price lower than the market price, and it was necessary for the corporation to transfer D to a stock company owned by the party-to-day and intended to assist in the business of purchasing apartment unsold in lots after transferring D to C around July 2009.”

1. On September 17, 2009, the crime of fraud C, which committed KRW 5 million on September 17, 2009, decided to invest the victim F in the D office located near Jung-gu Seoul metropolitan Government H, and decided to make an investment in the victim F, "E", and demanded the victim F, "E". However, the D director's credit guarantee bonds can be issued with credit guarantee bonds to solve national tax in arrears. This is 20 million won because I can be issued with credit guarantee bonds. Only the I's credit guarantee bonds can promote the apartment sales business immediately on the part of Japan, and the amount prepared may be repaid by I if it is a week." However, it is refused, and it is demanded that the victim's credit guarantee bonds should be prepared to the effect that "the business will not proceed immediately if I enters the defendant's credit guarantee bonds," and that the victim's credit guarantee bonds should not be urged by the victim."