도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. Around March 27, 1998, at around 19:15, the employees of the Defendant’s employees, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case, run the G Cargo Vehicle owned by the Defendant with the freight loaded in excess of 2.9 tons in front of the Seoul Office of Business of the Horizontal Highway (Seoul).
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) which applies by the judgment prosecutor to the facts charged of this case, where a representative, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 with respect to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.
“The portion “” was determined as unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga, 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) and thus retroactively lost its effect.
Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.