However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, around January 13, 2018, around 17:40 on January 13, 2018, around the house of the victim B (66 years) located in Mapo-gu Seoul building B (66 years) No. 201, the Defendant had been married with the husband of the Defendant.

I think that it is dangerous and that the loss and digital knife of the current state of the market managed by the injured party due to blue blue and brue, which are dangerous objects, have been damaged by a flooding.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the victim's residence, door, photograph, and criminal tool;

1. Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (in consideration of the circumstances, such as the point agreed with the victim, the primary crime, the health status of the defendant, etc.);

1. Article 32 (1) 3 and Article 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for damages is unclear because the applicant has agreed on the compensation, so it is not reasonable to issue an order for compensation);