업무방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 10, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced by the Seoul Western District Court to imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. and is currently pending in the appellate trial.
1. On May 26, 2013, at around 14:40 on May 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim D who is the facility manager in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, to “A return all the paid money because he/she has come to his/her own interest,” and (b) demanded the victim D to return the money if he/she won a lawsuit by filing a lawsuit with the court.
The Defendant committed a disturbance by not later than 17:10 on the same day, by putting a door to “Chewing year” and lest the office door should not be closed, such as returning sexual money and continuing large sounds.
As such, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s C facility management work by force for about 2 hours and 30 minutes.
2. At around 17:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) 17:10 on the same day, the victim F (the 49-year-old age), who was an employee of the Seodaemun Police Station E District Unit of the Seodaemun Police Station, dispatched the Defendant at the same place; (b) took care of the victim in front of the victim, including C, including the defect in attempting to arrest an offender in the crime of interference with business; (c) and (d) the victim’s hump to the police.
Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.
3. At around 17:30 on the same day, the Defendant continued to commit the crime of paragraphs (1) and (2) above F, who tried to investigate after the arrest of a flagrant offender, in the E District District G located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, with the crime of paragraphs (1) and (2) above, the Defendant committed an act that appears in F with the hand floor, and the Defendant committed an act that considered in F with the hand floor, and the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness D and F;
1. Each police statement made to D or F;
1. The defendant;