However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 23:20, the Seoul Southern-gu Police Station C District of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) on the issue of the taxi fare that the Defendant gets on board, the Defendant and the above taxi driver returned to the Republic of Korea; and (c) on his hand, he heard that the Defendant returned to the Republic of Korea from D, a police officer belonging to the above earth, and flicked the chest of the above D, and flicked the flat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of civil petitions by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV image data of victims of written statement by the police against the defendant's legal statement E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act are as follows: (a) comprehensively taking into account all the conditions of sentencing, including the background and contents leading to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s age and environment; and (c) the circumstances after the crime.