A, B, D, and F shall be fined 2,000,000, Defendant C shall be fined 3,000,000, and Defendant E shall be fined 1,000.

Defendants are social good-faiths and ex post factos.

1. Defendant A, B, C, D, and F’s gambling Defendants, from around 18:0 on September 24, 2013 to around 21:20 on the same day, had 52 h’H’s clothes in Suwon-gu G located in Suwon-si divided the 52 h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’, and combined the same h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h

2. Defendant E’s crime of gambling and aiding and abetting the Defendants in gambling by facilitating the Defendants’ gambling activities, such as by purchasing and providing rum cards used in gambling places and gambling, even though the Defendants, in the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) above, and at the place set forth in paragraph (1) above, with knowledge of gambling as described in paragraph (1) above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of seized articles, photographs and on-site photographs Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A, B, C, D, and F: The amendment by Act No. 11731 of April 5, 2013 of each Criminal Act, Article 246(1)

B. Defendant E: Articles 246(1) and 32(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant E by law and mitigation: Articles 32 (2) and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the Defendants had no record of punishment for gambling crimes, and the criminal records of Defendant C, etc., are determined as per the order.