If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant, without paying a penalty to pay a penalty to the existing Internet opening Internet, thought that he/she will use the name change document by forging the name change document without the consent of the victim C.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On May 24, 2012, the Defendant stated 'C' in the customer name column, 'E' in the cell phone column, 'E' in the cell phone column, 'InternetTV', 'Internet Building 107 1502 'Welsan City Building' in each application date, 'C', 'C' and 'C' in each document necessary to change the name of the Internet and TV combined with the TV combined with the Internet subscribed in the name of 'D' at a place where it is impossible to identify the place. (b) On June 8, 2012, the Defendant stated 'C' in the name of 'C', 'E' in the cell phone column, 'E' in the cell phone column, 'Internet Building 107 - 1502 - in each application date, 'C' and 'C' in each application date, '200 - - 12 - in each application date.

As such, the Defendant each forged C’s name change documents.

2. The defendant who exhibits the above investigation documents;

(a).

At the same time and at the same place as the same as the same paragraph, SKB Bad Co., Ltd. presented each forged document of change of ownership as if they were genuinely formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of C witness and K;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. - Two copies of a certificate of accession, two copies of an application for accession, two copies of an application for accession, each application for accession, and copies of an identification card.

1. -The application of the law of conversation content to the Kakao Stockholm.

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Article 234 and Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime.