손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from June 20, 2018 to May 30, 2019.
1. The facts subsequent to the facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by adding up the whole purport of the pleadings to the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1-3.
The plaintiff and C are married couple who completed the marriage report on June 10, 2002, and they have two children of 2002 and 2003 under the chain.
B. Around February 11, 2018, Defendant and C were discovered to the Plaintiff while boarding a taxi in the subway station located in the subway station located in the 100 subway station according to the mountain of the Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The gist of the parties’ assertion (1) The Defendant, despite being aware that the Plaintiff’s spouse had a spouse, continued unlawful acts, such as having a sexual intercourse with C from May 2017 to May 2018.
Before the Defendant entered into an inhuman relationship with C, the relationship between the Plaintiff and C was smooth. Due to the Defendant’s unlawful act, the Plaintiff was suffering from the failure of the marital relationship between C and C, thereby suffering from mental distress.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 30,000,100 won to the plaintiff as consolation money for such unlawful act.
(2) Around May 2017, the Defendant requested Defendant C to produce and install a kitchen house, such as a kitchen, at the Defendant’s house, and became aware of C. The Defendant did not commit any unlawful act.
In addition, the marital relationship between the plaintiff and C has already occurred before the defendant became aware of C.
Therefore, the defendant's establishment of a simple friendly relationship with C cannot be a tort against the plaintiff.
B. The following facts are acknowledged in light of the overall purport of the pleadings in video recording or video recording of Gap evidence Nos. 4-8 and 10.
(A) At around 23:10 on May 27, 2017, C was accommodated with a woman who driven a car used with the Pyeongtaek Plaintiff as an E hotel located in king-si D, and at around 08:20 on the following day, C was driven by the said woman and went to the said hotel.