However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On October 31, 2018, at around 22:49, the Defendant driven B taxi on the road in front of the entrance area of the Seoul subway located in the 229-ro, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”). On the ground that the taxi did not have passengers on the taxi, the Defendant was under control by public officials D of Seoul Special Metropolitan City and C on the ground that the taxi was operated with a light of an empty car beacon and a taxi beacon, etc., the Defendant, while taking a bath, assaulted D’s car once by hand, twice the body was pushed, and boomed on the face.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on taxi refusal by public officials C.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that there are many criminal records accompanied by violence, including the background and content of the crime of sentencing, the form and degree of violence, the suspended execution, etc. However, it appears that the state of health is somewhat inappropriate due to the recognition of the crime, physical disability, etc., and other factors favorable or unfavorable to the defendant during pleadings, such as the defendant's age, career, financial standing, and family relationship.