beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.01.17 2013고단3638

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Fraud;

A. On March 31, 2013, the Defendant presented G’s resident registration certificate to F, an employee of the victim D, who is a victim of the C Building 102, around 31, 2013, and said, “I want to open a mobile phone. I want to open a mobile phone.”

However, the defendant was not G, and there was no fact that he was allowed to open a mobile phone in his name. Therefore, even if the victim received a mobile phone from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone installment and the fee normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the above F one cell phone (A860L) cell phone (H and LG U), which is the victim's ownership, from No.6 (A860L) and acquired it by fraud.

B. On April 7, 2013, the Defendant presented the victim’s resident registration certificate to the Defendant at K of the operation of the victim J in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in O in order to read “A in

However, the defendant was not G, and there was no fact that he was allowed to open a mobile phone in his name. Therefore, even if the victim received a mobile phone from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone installment and the fee normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the victim the 946,000 won of the market price of 946,000 mobile phones (L and SKT).

C. On April 15, 2013, the Defendant presented the victim’s resident registration certificate to the victim at the victim N in the victim’s 1st floor M in Sungsung-si, that “I want to open a mobile phone at home, and I want to open a mobile phone.”

However, the defendant was not G, and there was no fact that he was allowed to open a mobile phone in his name. Therefore, even if the victim received a mobile phone from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone installment and the fee normally.

Nevertheless, the defendant.