However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 26, 2017, the Defendant, along with B, moved CCTV installed behind the calculation unit, in the E-Si room operated by the victim D on January 26, 2017, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, in a manner that the Defendant did not photograph the scene of the crime, and in the case of B, after opening a credit cooperative located in the calculation unit, 20,000 won in cash, which is the victim’s possession.

They go back.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning simplified larceny;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation [the scope of recommendations in the sentencing criteria] - The basic area (from June to June) of types 2 (general larceny) for general property - the scope of comparative sentence between types of punishment and recommended sentences: One year to one year and one year and six months (decision of sentence] - The favorable circumstances: The defendant recognized his/her mistake - The defendant has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime by being sentenced to a fine of two million won for larceny in 2016, and did not agree with the victim;