공갈등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four months, with prison labor for a term of two, three or four years, with prison labor for a crime as provided in the judgment.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On June 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud at the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court for six months on June 28, 2014, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on June 28, 2014, and the facts charged in this part of the charges of "2016 Highest 7643" was specified in accordance with the daily list of crimes. Since the crimes committed before and after the confirmation of criminal records in the judgment, the charges revealed in the list of crimes were divided into paragraphs (1) and (2) of the facts charged. This was divided into paragraphs (1) and (2) of the crime committed by dividing only the expressions before and after the final judgment of the above crime record, and there was no substantial change
The defendant is a person who has been engaged in activities as an interest reporter for the head of the branch of the ASEAN-si branch and the head of the branch of the ASEAN-si branch as an incorporated association, and is found at the national construction site of apartment houses, etc. using the above status.
- Having discussed the problems such as dump trucks, dump trucks, and splates simultaneously scattered dust, moving oil, wastes, etc. to the equipment during the construction site with a tank crocon vehicle, with intent to take advantage of the fact that if the company acts as an environment-related civil petition or reporting to the contents disadvantageous to the company, or filing a complaint with an administrative office, etc., the company concerned may not refuse the Defendant’s request by concerns over criminal punishment, suspension of construction, etc.
1. On December 201, 201, the Defendant accused F of E Co., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd. of the Defendant, who did not have sufficient fire-proof facilities, and instead sealed the walls inside and outside of apartment buildings (which did not seal it with an roller and sealed it) . Then, the Defendant accused the Defendant of working.
In the absence of money, “in the event of an administrative disposition, criminal punishment, discontinuance of construction, etc., they were frighting to suffer disadvantage.”
As can be seen, the Defendant: (a) 200,000 won around December 22, 201, from the person who frighted the said victim and frighted therein; and (b) 200,000 won.