On August 26, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (compact) at the Suwon method, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2016.

On August 12, 2016, at the court of Suwon District Court 301, the Defendant appeared as a witness of D, C, and the Defendant appeared at D, C, and E around February 23:00, 2016 at D’s home to put the portion of smoking once of AB-CHMINACA, which is a local mental medicine, into gambling, and made it inhaled each end, but the prosecutor’s “I might not know that it was difficult to avoid this in advance because the Defendant followed the witness’s machine at the time of smoking at home, and then taken it back, but it was impossible to do so.

In addition, the witness shall memory up to what he is in the main machine, but thereafter, the question "I n't know that he is fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl'.

As the Ngrent Dog, the inspector had been drinking a lot of alcoholic beverages, and he was flick in the flives.

It shall be in accordance with the preceding paragraph.

However, we did not regard any person as being recipient.

I reply to “I,” and consider “I cannot avoid any question that “I have difficulty in getting out......”

Because they did not see that they were not so, they should be judged.

I have the honor to:

“The witness,” and the counsel’s “Is the Defendant correctly observed the form in which he inhales the hemp;

I did not witness the question "I have not observed".

I did not consider it.

The presiding judge shall reply to the question, “I do not answer the witness even at the office of D, and answer the question, “I do not have any statement to the other person even at the time of the office of D.”

By replying “A false testimony contrary to memory” and perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness;