However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2017 Highest 2263"

1. On June 20, 2015, the Defendant, at the office of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and D factory in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoul, and the victim E (52) to establish the “F in order to operate a large business.”

The automobile parts business are same, and it is a state of securing business through regular management who worked in the modern automobile.

It is expected to substitute the quantity of the factory operated by the victim.

Of the capital KRW 100,000,000 and parts processing machinery are leased, and the phrase “to distribute rent and profits on the face of the week” was false.

However, in fact, the defendant was not able to pay the wages to the members of the existing dispute mediation committee, and the case was forced to be forced by losing the claim for the price of goods that had been filed by the customer, and the lease fee for the machinery in the leased factory was not paid properly, and since it was not secured by the modern vehicle related business, even if it was not used as the repayment of the existing debt, living expenses, etc., or as the relocation fee of the existing factory in the dispute mediation committee, there was no intention or ability to use it for the establishment and operation of the dispute mediation committee and the transfer fee of the existing company.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of D in the case of a foreign exchange bank account in the aggregate of KRW 5 million around June 30, 2015 and KRW 45 million around July 1, 2015. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26817, Jul. 1, 2015>

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On September 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the Gyeongbuk-gun G in the Gyeongbuk-gun G operated by the said victim, the Defendant: (b) sought to obtain a business contract from the Defendant at the place where the said victim would create a “LG smart shop; and (c) requested the Defendant to use the coo vehicle in the name of the contract.

On December 31, 2015, the term "the repayment" was made by means of a false statement to allow a vehicle to live.

However, in fact, the defendant has been specifically promoted the LG Smart Project in the above circumstances.