사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The court below rejected the application for compensation filed by the applicant for compensation, and the applicant for compensation cannot file an objection against the judgment dismissing the application for compensation pursuant to Article 32(4) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings. Thus, the dismissed portion is excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court.
2. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
3. The lower court determined the Defendant’s punishment, taking into account the favorable and unfavorable circumstances of the Defendant, as seen above.
In full view of all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing in this Court, the judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion.
There is no special change in circumstances that can evaluate or change the sentence of the court below.
In addition, even if the sentencing grounds revealed in the proceedings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, etc., are comprehensively taken into account, the sentencing of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because it is too big.
It does not appear.
The defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.
4. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.