beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.03.31 2015나2043088

위약금

Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reason why the court states this part of the basic facts is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion, unlike the agreement of this case, is intended to dismiss the plaintiff from the office of representative director as follows. Thus, according to the above agreement, 50 million won and damages for delay must be paid to the plaintiff.

1) 피고는 원고가 등기를 위하여 피고에게 맡겼던 원고의 대표이사 인감과 인감 발급 카드를 이용하여 원고 명의의 대표이사 사임서를 위조하려 하였으나 실패하였고, 또한 2013. 12. 19. 피고가 대표이사직에서 사임하는 데 필요하다고 하면서 원고에게 백지위임장을 내밀고 인감을 찍어달라고 요구하여 사임서를 위조하려 하였으나 원고의 거절로 사임서 위조에 실패하였다. 2) C의 창업주인 F는 원고를 C에서 몰아내기 위해 원고가 회사 자금 77억 원을 횡령하였다고 고소한 후 원고가 체포되면 체포되어 있는 48시간 동안 C을 장악하려는 음모를 꾸몄다.

On December 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) collected 55 copies of each business office of F and C on December 6, 2013, and held an emergency countermeasures meeting to distribute false documents that slander the Plaintiff; and (b) instigated and publicize the copies thereof, and tried to attract the Plaintiff from the Company.

B. First of all, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant intended to forge the resignation certificate under the Plaintiff’s name solely based on the descriptions of Gap’s 2 through 5, and 10, and the testimony of the witness I of the trial party witness I as to whether the Defendant attempted to forge the resignation certificate under the Plaintiff’s name, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Next, as to whether the defendant tried to scam the plaintiff with F, the defendant scam the plaintiff from F along with the testimony of the witness I of the trial. The defendant scambling the plaintiff from C only with F, with the testimony of the witness of the trial.