beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.08.29 2019고단907

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 업무방해 피고인은 2019. 3. 15. 20:10경 김해시 B에 있는 피해자 C이 운영하는 D마트 앞 분식 코너에서 떡꼬치를 먹던 중, 피고인이 먹고 있던 물떡을 오뎅국물에 담그려 하는 것을 본 피해자가 “먹던 것을 국물에 담그지 마세요.”라고 말하였다는 등의 이유로 위 마트 안에 들어가 위 피해자에게 시비를 걸고 이를 제지하려는 E에게 “씹할 놈아, 내가 뭐 잘못했나, 내가 아줌마에게 뭐 잘못했나”라고 말하고, 손에 소주병을 거꾸로 쥔 채 이를 그곳 인근에 주차되어 있던 차량 쪽으로 던질 듯한 태도를 취하고, 위 피해자에게 “씹할 년아”, “술 파는 년” 등 욕설을 하는 등 마트 안팎을 오가며 그곳에 들어오려던 손님들을 들어오지 못하게 하는 등 그 때부터 같은 날 21:20경까지 사이에 약 1시간 동안 소란을 피웠다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the business of the above victim by force.

2. Around 21:20 on March 15, 2019, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim on the ground that: (a) the victim G, the horse captain of the Gyeongnam Police Station in the Gyeongnam Sea Police Station in the Gyeongnam Sea Police Station, who was subject to reporting and heard his/her statement before the said DNA, was shot back to the Defendant; (b) the victim G, who was the horse captain of the F Zone in the F Zone in the Gyeongnam Sea Police Station, was shot back to the Defendant; and (c) other customers who had been in the said DNA business owner C, other customers who had been in the said place, and many and unspecified H high school students, etc. who had passed the said horse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (a) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense.