A. The building of six stories above the F-293 square meters in Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant building”) was owned by G.

B. The Plaintiffs concluded a lease agreement on part of the instant building (hereinafter each of the above lease agreements is specified as “Plaintiff 00-lease agreement,” and all of them collectively referred to as “each of the instant lease agreements”) with H who represented G by the broker of Defendant E, a real estate broker.

(1) The Defendant asserted that Defendant E had not mediated the Plaintiff’s lease contract and assisted the Plaintiff to prepare the contract. However, according to the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 5, Defendant E had mediated the Plaintiff’s lease contract. From February 1, 2012 to February 5, 2014, Defendant E had 2D 400,000 to February 1, 2012, 200 to February 1, 2012, 200 to February 1, 2012, 200 to February 30, 2012, 200 to February 30, 30,000,003 A40 to April 4, 2016, 2014; and

C. At the time of each of the instant lease agreements, the instant building and its site were ① (i) January 9, 2008; (ii) the maximum debt amount of KRW 1,820,00,000; (iii) the debtor G; (iv) the debtor G; (v) the debtor; (v) the debtor; (v) the debtor; (v) the debtor; (v) the debtor; (v) the debtor; (v) the future mutual savings bank; (v) August 25, 2010; (v) the debtor; (v) the debtor; (v) G; (iv) the debtor; (v) the mortgagee; (v) the mortgagee; and (v) the lessee; and (v) the lessee; and (v) the lease on a deposit basis, other than the debtor G; (v) the date of receipt, 150,000,000 won.

On April 11, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court applied for a voluntary auction on the instant building and its site, and the foregoing.