When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 29, 2018, around 23:43, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports and received the Defendant’s desire to take care of the police officers dispatched to return home; and (b) took care of the police officer E’s body on several occasions; and (c) took one time as a drinking buckbucks.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 reporting and handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a therapy in the fadi camp ground;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the following: (a) the defendant repents and reflects the instant crime; (b) the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment; (c) the deposit of some money for the victimized police officers; and (d) the use of violence against two police officers in uniform; and (c) the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the circumstances.