A. Although it was true that the Defendant, as stated in this part of the facts charged, found the victim’s house at the time, did not assault the victim at the time.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (the amount of KRW 3 million) is excessively unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court can sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim as stated in this part of the facts charged.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is just, and there is no error by mistake of facts as pointed out by the defendant, which affected the

1) The Defendant appears to have found the victim’s house for the purpose of resisting the victim under the influence of alcohol.

In other words, the Defendant had a record of receiving a summary order of KRW 50,00,00 as of April 25, 201 (Seoul District Court Decision 201Da3908, Daejeon District Court Decision 2011Da3908) on the grounds that “The Defendant and his children found their house and her son son son son son son son son and son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son.).”