beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.10.13 2020가단216946

건물인도

Text

1. The defendant points out of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 of the separate sheet No. 2.

Reasons

In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, it may be recognized as the grounds for the claim and the facts stated as the changed grounds for the claim.

Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff, a rearrangement project implementer, each of the items indicated in the attached Table 2 drawings Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1, among the real estate listed in the attached Table Nos. 1 list, the part (A) part (B) connected in the order of 13.11 square meters, among the same real estate, the items indicated in the same drawings No. 5, 6, 7, 11, 7, 8, 9, and 10 square meters, among the items of the same real estate, the part (B) part (B) connected in the order of 16.29 square meters, among the same real estate, to each of the items (c) parts

The defendant asserts that the above real estate shall not be transferred before receiving the cost of moving a house and the cost of moving a house. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant satisfies the requirements for the payment of the cost of moving a house and the cost of moving a house under Article 78(5) of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects and Articles 54(2) and 55(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the above Act, and therefore, the defendant's above assertion is rejected as it has no reason to review the remainder of the claim

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.