A person who raises a dog has a duty of care to prevent such danger, such as binding of a dog or putting it on a fence, because he/she is at all times at risk of injuring another person.

Nevertheless, at around July 9, 2018, the Defendant neglected management, such as the Defendant’s failure to properly manage cat fat lines, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as creative failure to keep the victim’s left part of the fat fat fat fat, where the fat 2-maat fat fat fat exceeds the fence and coming to the road adjacent to the warehouse, and the fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fats.

2. The case is a crime falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act. The fact that a written agreement was submitted to the court on June 28, 2019, stating the victim’s withdrawal of the wish to punish the defendant, is significant in this court. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.