However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:00 on January 16, 2015, the Defendant sought to grow from the victim’s house under the influence of alcohol while drinking together with the victim, but was refused from the victim.

Although the Defendant continued to have been drunkd by the victim, it was difficult for the victim's house, but the victim refused it, left the house, and the Defendant used the kitchen, which is a dangerous object in which the blicker was blicker, and suffered injury such as an trauma and flick, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Seizure records;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a medical certificate and an appraisal report);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] : habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury; category 1 (Habitual Injury, Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury), the mitigation area (including one year and six months through two years and six months); in the case where punishment is not imposed (including advanced efforts to recover damage) or considerable damage is recovered (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence is not appropriate; the degree of injury suffered by the victim is limited to the degree of injury suffered by the victim; however, according to the evidence that the crime of this case is deemed to have occurred contingent while the Defendant and the victim are under the influence of alcohol, even after the victim knife k, the victim and the victim did not know it properly.