소유권말소등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of the following '2. Additional Judgment' to the plaintiff's assertion, and thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(The first instance court's findings and determination are justifiable in light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the first instance court, and the evidence No. 6-11 submitted by the Plaintiff in this court, and the first instance court's findings and determination are justifiable).
A. The summary of the assertion 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a partnership agreement operating the camping site. Before January 13, 2016, the Defendant paid KRW 101,870,000 to the Plaintiff as its partner deposit. The Defendant tried to offer as collateral and obtain loans from the Defendant, the Defendant’s ownership, C, D, and E, the Defendant, as well as to prepare for partner funds, such as camping site management and operation. However, I would be possible to grant loans in the event that the above land cannot be used as a franchise loan, and each of the instant land, the Plaintiff’s ownership, is provided as joint collateral. Accordingly, according to the Defendant’s proposal, the Plaintiff transferred the instant land under the name of the Defendant, and the instant land and each of the instant land owned by the Defendant are transferred KRW 460,00 million with the joint collateral loan of KRW 40,000,000,000,000 to the Defendant for the remainder of the registration to use as the trust deposit (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 20015Da2815.