Judgment

The attitude of recognizing and opposing the crime of this case seems to be.

However, even though the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment five times for the same crime, one time for the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, and one previous crime of fine, the Defendant committed the larceny of this case over five times during the period of repeated crime, and committed a crime of fraud and the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act by using stolen credit cards.

The damage recovery was not performed properly.

Since the minimum statutory penalty against the crime of larceny committed by the defendant is two years of imprisonment, the sentence imposed by the court below is the lowest sentence.

In addition, considering all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, and health condition, the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because it has no reason to appeal.