beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.08 2018고단300

자동차관리법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person engaged in fixed non-business which checks the performance and condition of used cars in Seo-gu, Gwangju.

A. At around 13:00 on January 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) checked the performance and condition of the structure, devices, etc. of a used motor vehicle, which is a used motor vehicle, in the foregoing industrial company; and (b) knew that the said motor vehicle was an accident vehicle that had been repaired before and after the steering day; (c) indicated “free” on the column for the inspection of performance and condition of a used motor vehicle (excluding simple repair) and delivered it without indicating the particulars of the said repair in the vehicle’s condition column; and (d) notified the victim G of the performance and condition of the said vehicle’s structure, device, etc.

B. On June 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) checked the performance and condition of the structure, apparatus, etc. of the HHH-ray car; and (b) confirmed that the rubber barge of a speed-based type snick, such as the power transmission device of the said car, requires maintenance, such as tearing, and leakage generated; but (c) confirmed that the Defendant was in need of maintenance, such as the transmission of power of the record of inspection of performance and condition of used cars.

By marking the "Franp" in the Art column and delivering it, the victim I notified the victim I of the performance and condition of the structure, device, etc. of the said car.

2. Defendant B is a person who actually operates E with the management department of K located in the Seo-gu in Gwangju High-gu.

An automobile management businessman shall not lease or have another person occupy and use all or part of the business place.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from December 2, 2010 to October 12, 2017, took part in the proportion of 6 to 4, and leased 9m2 to A with the said place of business, thereby allowing A to check the performance and condition of used cars.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. G, I.