The scope of punishment according to the law of the court below in Part VI of the judgment of the court below.

2. The lower court determined a sentence by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances and the matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act. A person under way: A person subject to a sentence of the same kind: A person subject to a punishment; a person subject to a punishment of the same kind; a person subject to a punishment by deception is a large amount; and a person subject to a mitigation: The Defendant’s confession of each of the crimes in this case; the grounds for unfair sentencing alleged by the Defendant are already considered as having already been determined by the lower court; and accordingly, the lower court’s punishment, which is determined thereunder,

In addition, there is no reason to judge that the sentencing conditions have changed in the trial.

Therefore, it is reasonable to respect the sentencing of the lower court, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that there is no reason to reject the appeal, and the part of the judgment of the court below which clearly states a clerical error is corrected in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the