문서손괴
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant is the representative of the Co., Ltd. C in the Dong-dong, Seoul.
A victim D retired from office on November 12, 2014, and prepared a letter of agreement stating the grounds for retirement and the amount of retirement allowances, etc., and delivered it to the defendant. On December 5, 2014, around 11:20, the victim D returned to the defendant's office located in the above industrial company office and gave tear.
At around 12:00 on December 5, 2014, the Defendant demanded that the agreement be returned to the tearer victim, and assaulted the victim by hand in order to deduct the agreement from the dominion of the victim, while making a verbal dispute with the victim refusing to do so.
2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution; and
(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Articles 260 (3) and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act);
B. The victim expressed his intention not to punish him after the prosecution of this case
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);