난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. In the course of the disposition, the following facts: (a) status exemption (B-1) of visa status exemption (B-1) of May 27, 2014 on the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Kingdom of the Republic of Korea; (b) the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and February 21, 2017 on the date of February 15, 2017 of the date of the application for refugee status recognition application (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (b) the details of the application that the Plaintiff could not sufficiently establish a well-founded fear that he/she would suffer persecution: (c) the date of the application for objection that was made on April 17, 2017 of the date of the date of the application for objection; (d) there is no dispute over the grounds of recognition of the decision to dismiss the decision; (e) the evidence No.
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a person of nationality of the Kingdom of other countries (hereinafter “Tailand”).
On May 2014, the Plaintiff participated in the anti-government demonstration in Thailand, and many people who participated in the demonstration at that time were forced by the government of Thailand.
The plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea regardless of the Thailand because it is likely for the government of Thailand to be stuffed by itself.
As such, the Plaintiff’s return to Thailand is likely to harm the government’s gambling, and thus, the Plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is not a national who, due to such fear, is unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.” 2) In full view of the evidence and evidence as mentioned in subparagraph 3 as well as the following circumstances revealed by adding the purport of the pleading to the statement in subparagraph 3, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of being injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.”