However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 22:40 on November 201, 201, the Defendant, at the “D” restaurant located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, (D) around 22:40, the Defendant, while drinking together with the victim E (24 years) and F, was scambling with F, and the victim was fambling with F, and was fambling against the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) the victim’s face was fambling at two occasions; (b) the victim’s face was fambling; and (c) the victim suffered injury, such as the fambling of the dambre that requires treatment for about 42 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] general injury (the scope of general injury) does not exist (the person subject to special sentencing from April to January 6) in the basic area (the person subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence] The following circumstances are taken into account: (a) the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the age, sex, sex, family relationship, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and determine the sentence as ordered.

The defendant's act of injury caused the severe damage to the victim, but the defendant was not able to use the victim.

The victim wanted to punish the defendant.

A favorable circumstance: The defendant shows a attitude to repent his mistake as a primary offender.

The defendant deposited 9 million won for the victim.