Text

1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation on this case are as follows: "The defendant continued to extend the period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea after the date of the judgment of the court of first instance from 20th to 10th, "The defendant finally extended the period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea on April 17, 2017 to 22th, 2017 (hereinafter "the extension of the period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea" as of April 17, 2017)"; "The extension of the period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea as of April 17, 2017," "No more than 5th, 17th," and "No more than 2th, 5th, 5th, 5th, 17th," and "No more economic possibility that the plaintiff had engaged in the business or other similar transactions with the president of the Republic of Korea or the trade name of the plaintiff's existing business entity," and it appears that there were no economic possibility that the plaintiff had engaged in the business or other transactions.