However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 9, 2016, at around 18:40, the Defendant, at around 18:40, sustained C Apartment 103 Dong 603, which is one’s own residence in Busan City, B, and around 603, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant was her sloped to the said apartment house to check domestic violence; (e) the Defendant was satched; (e) the Defendant was satched to the Defendant for treatment of the Defendant, such as the number of days during which the Defendant was knife, knife, and knife the Defendant’s chest; and (b) the Defendant’s 2) the Defendant’s knif.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports, and at the same time, injured the victims respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. An investigation report (attaching a work site, diagnosis document, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of photography of damage, work log, and written diagnosis;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the crime is not good because of the crime committed by two police officers, who were dispatched by the defendant upon receiving a report of domestic violence, such as cutting booms with arms, etc.

However, the defendant has no record of punishment in addition to one fine, and the defendant has interested in the process of fighting married couple under the influence of alcohol.