When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, according to the final judgment of the lawsuit for construction cost filed by the Defendant in the Suwon District Court, the Defendant, as the claimant, was present on March 28, 2017 in accordance with the property specification case (name 10178 of the title 2017), which was the date when the property was registered, as the representative director of D (state) in accordance with the judgment of the court of Busan District Court, that the Defendant served as the representative director of D (state) in the branch court of the Suwon District Court, the Defendant submitted a list of property stating that the Defendant omitted the certificate of investment to the construction mutual aid association from the court of Busan District Court No. 353 of the title 353 of the title 2017 to the date specified in

However, there were investment certificates with respect to the D (State) construction mutual aid association.

Accordingly, the defendant submitted a false list of property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written accusation, an oath, an application for a seizure and delivery order of investment certificates, a text of judgment, a decision, and a record of seizure of investment certificates;

1. Article 68 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 68 of the Civil Execution Act concerning the selection of punishment, Article 68 (10) and (9) of the Act on the Selection of Fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;