Examining the records in light of the relevant legal principles, the court below was just in maintaining the court of first instance ordering the Defendant to collect the additional collection of KRW 25,000,000, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to additional collection.

Meanwhile, the argument that there was an error of mistake of facts in the judgment of the court below is not a legitimate ground of appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the ground of appeal or that the court below was

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.