소유권보존등기말소등
1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiffs corresponding to the revoked part are against the defendant.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is as follows, and this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the statement in the “1. Recognizing that the facts are identical to the statement in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.”
【Contents 5, 6, and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance】 On the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance 3, the following 7 of the judgment “Evidence 5, 6, and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance” shall be deemed to be “The evidence 5, 6,
On the third side of the judgment of the first instance court, the following five acts (hereinafter referred to as the “Special Measures Act”) shall be deemed to be “(Law No. 3627 of December 31, 1982, December 31, 1991, hereinafter referred to as the “Special Measures Act”).”
The registration of each of the above registrations of initial ownership (hereinafter referred to as "each of the above registrations of initial ownership") shall be added next to the "registration of initial ownership" in Chapter 4 of the judgment of the first instance.
After the fourth 4th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th, “and since this case’
"in addition".
2. Judgment as to the main claim
A. The plaintiffs' summary of the plaintiffs' assertion is the deceased's possession of each land of this case, and the defendant D, who is the plaintiff A who is his wife, his wife, his wife, L, son, the plaintiff A, the plaintiff C, and Samnam, the plaintiff C: 1: 3: 2: 3: 1: and 2, the land of this case is inherited at the rate of 1/13 of the J's heir due to the death of J, and K, L, A, B, C, and D inherited 1/13 of the J's share.
Therefore, the shares of each of the instant lands are Plaintiff A19/66 (=3/111/11 x 1/6), Plaintiff B 13/66 (=2/13 1/11 x 1/6), Plaintiff C7/66 (=1/11/11 x 1/6), Defendant 13/66 (2/11/11/11 x 1/6).
Meanwhile, without any title, the Defendant made a registration of preservation of ownership of each of the instant lands pursuant to a false letter of guarantee stating that “the Defendant purchased each of the instant lands from G” without any title.
Therefore, the defendant's share of the plaintiffs' inheritance among each of the land of this case is about 39/66.